In the manual is says it gives: +8str +4con +4ac The usual size changes (If I recall correctly that should be -1 to attack rolls, -1 AC and the changes entailed to weapon wielding along with the weapon wielded at the time enlarging) Is this balanced, or should it be halved as per the current SRD? Btw, when did it change in the SRD anyway? In the D&D wiki it has the same effects placed after the ToEE effects crossed out, so I guess at one point it was the same as in ToEE but got changed?
TOEE was originally made to use the 3rd Ed rule set and later, (last few months of production) changed to 3.5, this may explain the few things that just don't match up.
Is that how RM was in 3.0? If that's the case then RM's effects in the game are Troika intended as opposed to being some sort of error. If that's the case Troika thought it was ok and the D&D guys at least temporarily though it was ok for 3.0.
Basically it is not a modify for the balance of RM spell it is instead a modify toward the bonuses of "big size" Well, size matters much more in 3E:thumbsup: