can i ever get him back?

Oh, Queen Scryler, tell us more about this!

 

Uh...if you check the icon...

During my marriage, my wife would actually seek out that out that solution herself. It was, of course, a GOOD idea to cooperate. :eyebrow:

 

No, I do not want to check the icon, I want all humankind to benefit from Queen Scryler's written explanation! :chick:

 

Maybe with illustrations?

 

No illustrations...this forum/site is 'family rated,' I believe.

But I will give Sergio a hint: it's the equivalent, so I've heard, of running 7 miles.

So...get over psming and lose weight at the same time. Not a bad deal.

 

Yea, sure! Oh, this reminds me that I am still to get my prize for having the nicely-numbered post author (and that prize is a poster of Queen Scryler!)

<playing dumb>

And how illustrations of running couples could possibly violate the rules of a family-rated site?
Oh, I see, that's the "equivalent".
So, it is walking for 14 miles?
And how illustrations of walking couples could possibly violate the rules of a family-rated site?

 

Alas I have no talent for illustrating. Perhaps you do?

And...I think it would depend on what the running/walking couples were attempting to do...no?

 

Only one pair of legs is actually on the ground? Or maybe the run takes several hours?

 

Something new for the Kamasutra?

 

Exactly!

When a man runs, he has one leg touching the ground at any moment of time (except when he does not touch the ground at all),

when a woman runs she has one leg touching the ground at any moment of time (except when she does not touch the ground at all),

so when they run together, they may have two, one or no legs touching the ground!

<playing dumb>

I still do not understand if this is what Queen Scryler proposed.

 

It's not as fun as it sounds. While the bouncing DOES provide some motion, the one not doing the running is reduced to hanging on for dear life while their steed collapses beneath them. It's best to swerve off the trail. Carry a towel or something.

Sergi, are you SURE you're pretending? oke:

 

Oh no, not again!

GA -> unch: <- Sergio

<playing dumb>

Bah, you are derailing the thread!

We were discussing if she will be able to get him back or not!
I think anyone can get/return anyone else, but in most cases efforts to be taken are too great and make the fact of getting/returning not worth it.

(Example: why expend a lot of power to get/return X when you can get/return Y easier? Assuming the suitor likes X and Y evenly.)

 

Perhaps I am. If so, I apologize.

I'm going to interpret your advice to mean she should find someone else, because they would be easier to get than her former would be to get back.

I'm going interpret Scryler's advice to find someone who is more in tune with her needs.

My advice is also to move on, because if he withdrew after what you did, he wasn't that into you.

I wonder if writing that original post was all Betsy needed.

 

<playing troll>

See how smart BetseyPitts is, it provoked all of you into sharing your wisdom, yet remains silent and does not share any of its own... Well, assuming she is "it" she must have a very advanced AI !

<playing dumb>

As for your interpretation, you got my post wrong, for I did not give any "advice" on what to do. I just stated that "BetseyPitts" could get "Shawn" back if she so desires. I did not provide any thoughts on the matter of "should she do it", because this can not be determined with the information I have.

<being myself>

Hugs to everyone!

:hug: :hug: :hug: